: 9693 ( 9000 ) The Unity of the Soul in Plato ' s Republic
نویسندگان
چکیده
In Book Four of Plato's Republic, Socrates divides the soul. He argues that because one thing cannot do or undergo opposites in the same respect, in the same relation, and at the same time, some cases of psychological conflict can only be explained by supposing that the soul is actually more than one thing. But Socrates does not seem to deny that the soul is a unity. Rather, he seems to hold that the soul, like so many entities, is both a many and a one. He refers to the divisions as parts of the soul, and even at the end of Book Four, when he ascribes actions and attitudes to a part of the soul, he also ascribes them to the whole soul (esp. 439a-b, 439d). More generally, throughout the Republic, he treats each agent he discusses as a single locus of responsibility, including even the most psychologically wretched agent, who suffers from tyranny within (572b-580a, esp. 577d13-
منابع مشابه
Pleasure and Illusion in Plato
Plato links pleasure with illusion, and this link explains his rejection of the view that all desires are rational desires for the good. The Protagoras and Gorgias show connections between pleasure and illusion; the Republic develops these into a psychological theory. One part of the soul is not only prone to illusions, but also incapable of the kind of reasoning that can dispel them. Pleasure ...
متن کاملنگاهی تازه به اصول و مبانی عرفان(از نظرگاه فلسفی، صوفیانه و شاعرانه)
There is a few mystical works in Persian literature, the authors of which have mentioned into them the foundations of mysticism definitely. These terms can be inferred from mystical and sūfical works: “purification, devotion, mystical experience, annihilation, conservation of essence, mystical behaviour, rapture, love, poverty, mystical state, unity of existence, knowledge, Sheykh guidance, ...
متن کاملPlato Seeking for “One Real Explanation” in Phaedo
What this essay is to discuss is Plato''s theory of explanation in Phaedo. In this dialogue, we observe that Socrates criticizes both the natural scientists’ explanations and Anaxagoras’ theory of Mind since he thinks they could not explain all things, firstly, in a unitary and, secondary, in a real way. Thence, we are to call what Plato is seeking as his ideal explanation in Phaedo “One Real E...
متن کاملA Multiform Desire: A Study of Appetite in Plato’s Timaeus, Republic and Phaedrus
Pettersson, O. 2013. A Multiform Desire: A Study of Appetite in Plato’s Timaeus, Republic and Phaedrus. Filosofiska institutionen. 242 pp. Uppsala. ISBN 978-91-506-2325-3. This dissertation is a study of appetite in Plato’s Timaeus, Republic and Phaedrus. In recent research is it often suggested that Plato considers appetite (i) to pertain to the essential needs of the body, (ii) to relate to a...
متن کاملPlato on the foundations of Modern Theorem Provers
Is it possible to achieve such a proof that is independent of both acts and dispositions of the human mind? Plato is one of the great contributors to the foundations of mathematics. He discussed, 2400 years ago, the importance of clear and precise definitions as fundamental entities in mathematics, independent of the human mind. In the seventh book of his masterpiece, The Republic, Plato states...
متن کامل